Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-15-2021, 08:54 AM
rdoaner123 rdoaner123 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 10
Default Prop for 23 SeaCraft with transom-mounted Merc 250 EFI

Hello,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this setup? The SeaCraft is a 1978, and the Merc 250 EFI Offshore is from 1996.

I'm currently running a 17 pitch Mirage Plus, and am only getting 5,400 rpm and 46/47 mph with an empty boat.

Another thing is the prop blows out on turns, and the engine still needs to be raised a hole or two. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-15-2021, 05:06 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

What's your goal?


I would get the engine height set correctly first. It sounds like you are close. The mirage plus is a large diameter lower rake prop (15.5") and it does blowout pretty easily.


Rev4 17p will hold a lot better, but you might lose a few RPM's over the mirage plus 17p.

I personally would try an 18p Enertia (non Eco) which are faster than the mirage plus and hold a lot better.

19p Highfive is a very small diameter prop that's good in the low to mid range. That prop can ride high and won't blow out.



I ran a 225hp 3.0L carb Mariner with a 17p Rev4 for a week (before I sold the engine). Running light I could get into the high 40's trimmed up.





On the current engine 150hp Merc 4 stroke . . . I either run a 15p Enertia or 17p Highfive (depending on load).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2021, 07:05 PM
rdoaner123 rdoaner123 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 10
Default

Appreciate the reply! I'm shooting for a prop that gets me to at least 5,600rpm, and doesn't blow out. Good hole shot is a strong plus, as well as high cruising and top end speed.

What rpms were you turning on the 225 with the 17p rev4?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-15-2021, 11:46 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

If I remember correctly it was 5800rpms. That 3.0L engine drank fuel. I could believe how much it used. I put a 2.4L frankenmerc back on after that one until I repowered with the 150.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2021, 02:17 PM
rdoaner123 rdoaner123 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigshrimpin View Post
If I remember correctly it was 5800rpms. That 3.0L engine drank fuel. I could believe how much it used. I put a 2.4L frankenmerc back on after that one until I repowered with the 150.
How can it be that your 225hp motor turned a prop at 5800 rpm when my 250 can only turn and easier-to-turn prop at 5,400 rpm? Is there something wrong with my motor?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2021, 02:44 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default Prop Gear Ratios

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdoaner123 View Post
How can it be that your 225hp motor turned a prop at 5800 rpm when my 250 can only turn and easier-to-turn prop at 5,400 rpm? Is there something wrong with my motor?
There may be a difference in gear ratios like there was between Bushwacker’s 150 ETEC and my 150 HO ETEC, both on 20’ Seafaris. I dont remember the details but his liked the Cyclone better than mine, so he bought it. I had better low speed control at 17 mph and achieved the desired WOT RPM with a 17p High Five.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:30 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Rev 4 is the direction I would go.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2021, 12:23 AM
joshmon71 joshmon71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 194
Default

i have a 17p mirage plus getting dusty once i put on a 17p rev4 never went back. probably could have gone higher in height. the 17P blew out on hard turns. i lost 2-3mph and 200-300 rpm i think but don't have hard numbers at hand. wot speed less worried about than making sure engine can get into its proper wot rpm's. i can spin to 6k/6100 rpm heavy loaded trimmed up and more light load. 6400 is max. verado 275, 650lb motor. t-top.

looks like next winter I need to think about a pilot house for another major project. i've never ever seen over 42/43 light load.

have a new (to me its a 2020 merc 300) engine this season so prob go to a 18p rev4. that highfive though is interesting....hmmmm.....i like the stern lift of the rev 4.

Bigshrimpin How is the high 5 prop running in seas east of the cape / offshore compared to rev4? planes out about same speed?

that is one sweet pilot house Bigshrimpin! wowza! is that a seamark? they are out of business now? went looking around for them a few years back came up blank.
__________________
---------
1977 Seacraft, Armstrong Bracket
275(chipped 250!) Verado
Merc Rev 4 17P
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2021, 06:28 PM
rdoaner123 rdoaner123 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 10
Default

I should mention, I've been noticing the prop sometimes partially breaks free even when I'm going in a straight line and increase rpms. The prop shaft seems straight, so I'm not sure why this would be

Attached is a picture of the lower unit with slightly positive trim at 3600rpm. I circled the back of the anti-ventilation plate in red. You can barely see it through the water. Should I go up one hole or two?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2022, 12:33 PM
joshmon71 joshmon71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 194
Default

I love my Rev4. Never went back to a mirage plus. same issue as you cavitated with M+ only on turns. 250 Verado had a17P R4, and was just barely getting WOT needed. When I sourced a 275 ECU it was perfect peachy with a 17P R4 so you are probably right its on the edge of a 17P or 15P R4. Turns out I could have gone much higher with the R4....never did raise from 2008- till this season with a one year old used 300 Verado i snagged.

No idea why or where read (tht? and propgod?), but the 15P Rev4 had some reason for not being advisable desirable.

Raise you engine even more and get a R4 17P....I suppose you could go silly $$ and get a R4 XP 17P....

Right now, 300 V8, R4, running a 19P R4 heavy load and barely if even need to trim up, hitting 6K which is max end of WOT range. DO have tabs. I had the marina raise the engine so high I was sure it would need to go back down. I was wrong. Those R4s can really run high. I am debating a 20P or even 21P R4 for this summer.

GL, def some art and voodo to propping, heights.
__________________
---------
1977 Seacraft, Armstrong Bracket
275(chipped 250!) Verado
Merc Rev 4 17P
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft