Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2009, 08:47 AM
FINNERTY FINNERTY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Osterville, MA
Posts: 25
Default Was Potter the best?

I had a "Potter" 19 ft Master Angler that I bought new in 1976. When going through waves, it regularly leaked from the topsides. The dealer tried to seal it but was unsuccessful. I later bought a new 1985 23 ft Superfisherman built in Princeton, FL. It is still sound in all respects today and is solid as a rock. It has my vote over the Potter.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2009, 10:29 AM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default Re: Was Potter the best?

I don't own a Potter...however even Lexus makes a bad model every once in awhile
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2009, 11:00 PM
JW-Tex JW-Tex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kingwood, Texas
Posts: 198
Default Re: Was Potter the best?

Was Potter the best...No.

Moesly was the best he created it, Potter refined it and after the Potter years the quality decline began.

1985 is still considered a good year...but it will never be as good as a "Potter" or "Moesly.
__________________
Moesly 1969 20 CC & Potter 1978 23 CC (23 in storage awaiting rebuild)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2009, 12:07 AM
3rdday 3rdday is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 454
Default Re: Was Potter the best?

I believe the Moesly boats are the better built, and the better design. Potter splashed the original 21 and added a little length & some other features, one gave it a drier ride, but had a negative impact on the smooth ride he added a spray rail/chine, a reverse if you will which negated the full effects of the steps. Second, he reduced the size or depth of the steps which also took away some of the smmooth ride of the 21.
The bow area was cut down also, the 21 had almost 5 feet of freeboard from nose to water line which allows it to take on bigger seas without taking water over the bow.
I am not sure about the entry.. It doesnt look to be as agressive of a V as the 21, I could be wrong on that one.
Dont get me wron the 23 and others are fabulous boats, however the 21 is a much smoother riding boat.

Here are some pictures of the differences in the steps on the 21 & the 23.

The last picture illustrates the 5' freeboard at the nose.

[image]http://[/image]

[image]http://[/image]

[image]http://[/image]
__________________
I heard it on the coconut telegraph..........
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft