Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2012, 07:43 PM
boatless23 boatless23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
Default 1983 23ft seacraft cc Questions????

Hi i have some Questions about my project boat it is a 1983 23ft seacraft I have taken the gas tank out and all the foam cleaned out the bilge and installed a bulkhead then used bildge coat on the inside of the hull. Ready to start rebuilding!

1)what size gas tank should i get it came with a 144 gal ?Im thinking a 100 gal tank.

2)what size outboard motor? new one. Im thinking a 300 four stroke suzuki.

3)How much does my hull weigh?

4)I am replacing the deck any suggestions how it should be done and if i should raise it up a few inches?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2012, 08:16 PM
Blue197320 Blue197320 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami Fl
Posts: 947
Default

Why would you want to go down in fuel capacity? If anything I would go the same or bigger.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2012, 08:20 PM
boatless23 boatless23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
Default

I dont think i will ever fill a 144 gal tank but i am worried it will change the weight distrobution also i am getting a 4 stoke engine figure i can lighten the boat up a little with a smaller tank.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2012, 08:34 PM
Back Sound Back Sound is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 14
Default

1) it all depends on what you want to use the boat for. Where are u located? Will help decide how much fuel you need. If you are up north and like canyon runs then 120 + should work.
2) If you go with a four stroke then u will have to raise the deck.
3) 2500 lbs
4) what is the condition of the deck? Soft spots etc...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2012, 08:42 PM
PharmD2B31 PharmD2B31 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 113
Default

A friend of mine reworked a 23' Seacraft....


He installed a 150 gallon fuel tank which is what I would put in mine too if I was reworking one. When installing it, I would try to push the fuel tank as far forward as will be allowed by the boat. Also, to accomodate the heavier 4-stroke engines you will need to raise the floor at least 2" to accomodate for the self-bailing feature of the boat.

As far as engine, I would go with either a Suzuki 300 or a Yamaha F300. I personally am fixing to pick up a 23' Seacraft thats already bracketed and enclosed transom and I plan on putting a new Yamaha F300 on it. My friend with the above boat installed a Mercury Verado 350 SCI on his. Said that it works, but it is really too heavy for the boat. Said that if he were to do it over again he would have installed a Yamaha F300 on it.

Last edited by PharmD2B31; 12-27-2012 at 08:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2012, 10:23 PM
boatless23 boatless23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
Default

The deck is bad at least 10 different soft spots around the size of a football and the edges of the deck are chipped bad and the inside of the deck is saturated with water. I dont think i we be running more than 40 miles with the boat im out of manasquan inlet in nj. No canyon runs for this boat. i was thinking 3 inches for the deck?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2012, 10:25 PM
boatless23 boatless23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
Default

Is a yamaha lighter than a suzuki?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-27-2012, 11:23 PM
PharmD2B31 PharmD2B31 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boatless23 View Post
Is a yamaha lighter than a suzuki?
Here are the comparison specs.

Mercury 350 SCI ..... 667 lbs
Mercury 300 Pro ..... 20" ... 635 lbs (website notated lightest model, so Im assuming the 20" shaft)
Mercury Verado 300 ..... 20"...635 lbs (website notated lightest model, so Im assuming the 20" shaft)
Yamaha F350..... 25".. 804 lbs......30".. 822 lbs
Yamaha F300..... 25".. 562 lbs......30".. 571 lbs
Suzuki 300 ...... 25".. 604 lbs ..... 30" .. 615 lbs.

The Yamaha IS actually lighter than the Suzuki.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2012, 06:25 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PharmD2B31 View Post
Here are the comparison specs.

Mercury 350 SCI ..... 667 lbs
Mercury 300 Pro ..... 20" ... 635 lbs (website notated lightest model, so Im assuming the 20" shaft)
Mercury Verado 300 ..... 20"...635 lbs (website notated lightest model, so Im assuming the 20" shaft)
Yamaha F350..... 25".. 804 lbs......30".. 822 lbs
Yamaha F300..... 25".. 562 lbs......30".. 571 lbs
Suzuki 300 ...... 25".. 604 lbs ..... 30" .. 615 lbs.

The Yamaha IS actually lighter than the Suzuki.
If weight is a consideration, don't forget about the E-Tec! It's lighter than ANY of the listed motors, at 528/534 lbs for the 25"/30" 3.4L 300!

The 250/225, based on the 3.3L version of the same block, is 4 lbs lighter than the 300.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-27-2012, 11:03 PM
mrobertson mrobertson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 172
Default

The tank that came out of my 1985 23 was 115 gallons. We had an identical tank built for the rebuild. My power is an F250 yamaha on a 30 inch transom with no bracket. I have a bulkhead in the splashwell with a door that goes up. We left the deck the stock height and have no problem self bailing, and my deck stays dry all the time.

My boat has seen 47 mph with 2 men and light fishing gear. A heavy load, 42 is about it. Last season we steamed out slightly over 40 miles, trolled all day, steamed back in with a box full of tunas, and we burned about 47 - 48 gallons of fuel.

A 150 gallon tank isn't going to weigh that much more than a 100 gallon tank to make a difference, empty. Just because you have 150 doesnt mean you have to fill it. Better to have the capacity and not need it, that need it and not have it.

Think about what you are doing with the boat and make the appropriate decision. Have a buddy that has a 23 with a 90 gallon tank. Its strictly a nearshore boat and has a 250 4 stroke and he has no complaints at all.

FWIW - if you dont need to go 50+ mph, a single 250 is all you need on that hull. I cruise about 30 mph getting 3.2 mpg.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft