Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2014, 10:22 AM
Was12 Was12 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Thumbs up Seacraft 32. Twin 200 Yamaha 4 strokes!

My dad recently bought a 2000 seacraft 32. Before buying the boat we made sure that the updates were done to it and they were. When he bought it it had twin merc 225's and it ran 44 mph. We already had a set of Yamaha 200's from another boat so we repowered it with them. Every outboard dealer or anyone that knew about the 32 said it was going to be under powered but we figured we test them before getting a pair of bigger motors. The motors ran much better than expected. We have great hole shot and top speed. We are running 48.2 mph top speed and about 35 mph cruising at 4000 RPMs. The boat rides very well with the 200's. We ran in 3 to 5 ft seas from jupiter Fl to Marathon in 5 and a half hours which is about 195 miles. We only burnt about 110 gallons total and ran non stop.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2014, 10:33 AM
77SceptreOB 77SceptreOB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbia, SC.
Posts: 1,611
Default

That sounds good. I too am surprised that those twin 200s could produce that solid performance. Yamaha make a great motor.
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225
www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-17-2014, 11:40 AM
Capt Chuck's Avatar
Capt Chuck Capt Chuck is offline
gucci
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sailfish Capital, fla
Posts: 2,804
Default

I am wondering if you should lose an engine, I doubt that a single 200 would plane that hull
__________________


1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP --------



as "Americans" you have the right to ......
"LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2014, 01:42 PM
Ryan Ryan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ft. lauderdale fl
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Chuck View Post
I am wondering if you should lose an engine, I doubt that a single 200 would plane that hull
well to be fair Chuck the 225 isnt going to plane it either.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2014, 02:12 PM
Was12 Was12 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Default

I know that the 225 mercurys didn't push it on plane any better if not worse than the 200s so I know that the a single 225 isn't going to be pushing it. I will have to see what happens when I try to push it up with one engine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2014, 06:07 PM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

If you have the time and effort to humor me.

Install a Mirage Plus 13pitch prop on one of the engines and I will bet a beer that it will plane and run 32mph+.

People will laugh at me but I certain. 16x13 Mirage Plus on one of the engines will plane off and run. Yes, 200hp on a 32ft Seacraft.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2014, 06:53 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Was12 View Post
I know that the 225 mercurys didn't push it on plane any better if not worse than the 200s so I know that the a single 225 isn't going to be pushing it. I will have to see what happens when I try to push it up with one engine.
Your LU may not like that. Not much solace I know.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2014, 10:27 PM
FishStretcher FishStretcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,117
Lightbulb

The torque on the the gears will be the same, true. But the force from the higher thrust at lower speed will be resolved in the lower unit bearings. And the motor mounts. I don't design lower units, but I have a suspicion that this is something you can get away with for a time. Or at least get home and then tear down a LU and put new bearings in it. I suspect the gear teeth will be fine.

Just a guess.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-17-2014, 10:49 PM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishStretcher View Post
The torque on the the gears will be the same, true. But the force from the higher thrust at lower speed will be resolved in the lower unit bearings. And the motor mounts. I don't design lower units, but I have a suspicion that this is something you can get away with for a time. Or at least get home and then tear down a LU and put new bearings in it. I suspect the gear teeth will be fine.

Just a guess.
The thrust is all the same. If the thrust was higher the boat would go faster. The speed in which the gearcase travels through the water or the amount of thrust producted at a given RPM is not relevant since the max thrust would be identical at WOT as long as it can reach the recommended wot rpm and peak hp.

Outboard engines that push barges, heavy boats, or tow a lot do not have a decrease in life simply because the engine can only product so much load, torque and thrust. Propped correctly, their is no increase in wear, tear or load regardless of what the outboard is pushing or the prop. Max is at WOT regardless of prop.

Just my 2 cents. I would gladly chip in to see the owner run a 13 pitch prop on one of the twins to see it break 30mph.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-18-2014, 10:24 AM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captbone View Post
The thrust is all the same. If the thrust was higher the boat would go faster. The speed in which the gearcase travels through the water or the amount of thrust producted at a given RPM is not relevant since the max thrust would be identical at WOT as long as it can reach the recommended wot rpm and peak hp.

Outboard engines that push barges, heavy boats, or tow a lot do not have a decrease in life simply because the engine can only product so much load, torque and thrust. Propped correctly, their is no increase in wear, tear or load regardless of what the outboard is pushing or the prop. Max is at WOT regardless of prop.

Just my 2 cents. I would gladly chip in to see the owner run a 13 pitch prop on one of the twins to see it break 30mph.
Let me take my little brain off the short bus for a minnow. If 1 LU is being asked to push the same weight as 2 , is that not increasing the loads of torsion, shear, and compression?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft