|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mercury Diesel Sterndrive test ride
I got a ride today on a 2012 Chaparral 19' deck boat/bow rider powered by a 150 hp 2.0L turbo diesel sterndrive. This boat was just repowered after having "sunk" on the trailer last year. (plug in, lots of rain, dead battery).
Old power was a 3.0L 135hp EFI. I can't speak directly to the performance with the old motor, but the brief ride today was interesting. New power was a reported $23K installed including a new fuel tank. (This was almost $6K more than was quoted prior to install) Old 135hp gas motor (as reported by owner): Top Speed - 42 mph Cruise speed - 25 mph Fuel consumption at cruise - 5.5 gph Fuel consumption at 80% power - 8.5 gph (about 35 mph) Time to plane - "about" 4 seconds New 150hp diesel motor (observed with Smart Gauges): Top Speed - 48 mph Cruise speed - 24 mph Fuel consumption at cruise - 2.9 gph Fuel consumption at 75% power - 6.7 gph (about 35-36 mph) Fuel consumption at WOT (3950 rpm) - 7.9 gph Time to plane - 4.5 seconds. It falls off plane at about 17 mph now, He never noticed what if did before. New power plant is about 115-120 lbs heavier than the old, according to the owner. That's 8.3 mpg at cruise, a 65% increase in economy, and still better than 6 mpg at WOT! New motor has power steering (not ordered, but installed and charged by the dealer in P'cola anyway, an extra $900) Because of the Diamond 4 Prop, I think with changing the prop he can get better planing performance with the right SS prop. I noticed it is VERY quiet, even at 75% power. We were able to talk without trying to shout over the engine noise. WOT is still noisy, though. One thing: Even with the diesel, it still didn't ride like a SeaCraft. It still rode like a Chaparral. :\ And Choctawhatchee Bay was really rough today.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes. Fr. Frank says: Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat! Currently without a SeaCraft (2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks '73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How much does the diesel package weigh? (Total of engine & Outdrive) Would two of them fit in a 23' I/O set up?
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225 www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't know about 2 of the 150HP but one of these will fit nicely:https://mercurymarine-gsdesign1.netd..._370_tier3.pdf
It is a twin turbo 4.2L 370 HP VWMarine engine with a Merc label. Brake Specific Fuel Consumption is about 40% of what it is for a small block chevy and it weighs about the same. I'm pretty sure it costs a good bit more though... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
32"L x 30"W x 30"H, compared to 29 x 26 x 21". Oh, yeah, it's about 2.5x the price, not counting the changes necessary to your on-board fuel system. Complete package; motor, transmission, transom group and drive is over $20K USD installed. But if you use the boat a lot, and plan on keeping it for 20+ years....
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes. Fr. Frank says: Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat! Currently without a SeaCraft (2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks '73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
the 370hp V8 with a Bravo XR drive is about 45k. Same width as the v6 just a little longer.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I had heard that low to mid 40's number for the 4.2 liter engine, but once again was not aware it included the beefed up Bravo drive which is a pretty big ticket item on its own. That is somewhat encouraging. The test numbers that I have seen for the 370hp have been in the 10-10.5 gph range at the economy cruise speed of 3000 rpm and around 20-21 at WOT of 4200. That's about 2/3 the fuel burn of a 300 Verado. If the 265 hp 3 liter in in the low $30K range, how much more is that than the MSRP for a new 4.2 liter Yamaha Outboard with the fly by wire setup?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cost is the big factor considering diesel power when compared to any gas set up OB or IO. On commercial boats that put 1k+ hours a year on the power it can make financial sense to go with diesel as the amount of fuel used over time will offset the increase in cost. That said, most recreational users will never use the amount of fuel over time to offset the overall cost difference between the two.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose ! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Call me doubting Thomas...48 mph...I just don't see this happening...I can just barely get 50 on a good day and on ruff water also.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] "If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin" my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594 |
|
|