Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2020, 01:41 PM
whistler whistler is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 27
Default 23 Sceptre OB on transom vs 23 CC with OB on bracket - impressions.

I have owned a '78 Sceptre 23 with a transom mounted outboard for 5 years. I just purchased a '78 23 CC with a bracket mounted outboard. Since questions about adding a bracket are pretty common, I wanted to share my impressions of the handling/performance differences in these 2 boats.

Boat 1: '78 Sceptre 23 with a Mercury 200 EFI 25" on the transom. The boat is largely original, without any structural modifications. Everything is in its original location. No hardtop. Boat has 12x12 tabs. Prop is a Mercury Rev 4.
Performance/handling impressions: This boat is awesome It jumps on plane quickly with relatively little bow rise. Runs flat, seems to really like 30MPH+ when conditions allow. With tabs down, it can stay on plane down to 12-13MPH for when it getts snotty and you need to slow down for comfort. Definitely has the legendary Seacraft ride. Almost always lands soft. Does not exhibit any weird handling in either head or following sea. Is easy to handle around the dock with good steering and response in both forward and reverse. The windshield provides excellent weather protection and the cuddy is great for dry storage. The huge "dance floor" in the back is great for trolling and ok for bottom fishing/live baiting.

Boat 2: '78 Sceptre 23 with a full transom and a Yamaha 250HPDI on a Hermco single bracket. Boat was redone some time ago and while the layout remains largely unchanged, it is probably lighter due to the use of foam for the sole and a smaller console. Boat has a small T-top with fiberglass top. The fuel tank may have been moved forward in the hull, but I am not yet certain. No trim tabs (yet). Prop is a Mercury Mirage.
Performance/handling impressions: Getting on plane is slower and with much more pronounced bow rise. The acceleration is probably the same or better, but since the boat planes at a higher speed, it takes longer to get on plane. Likes to run 30MPH+ as it really levels out. I did not specifically try to find the minimum planing speed but suspect it is around 18-20MPH. Once on plane, the ride is great. Lands soft, and the more rearward position of the helm in comparison to the Sceptre makes for a smoother ride for the captain. Around the dock, it definitely requires more throttle in reverse and is a little more lazy to turn - but not by much. The CC layout is very versatile and great for bottom fishing/live baiting. The CC layout also gives you a feeling of being closer to the water. Of course that goes both ways, and there is less protection from wind or spray.

Overall:
The change of CG when adding a bracket is readily felt and impacts performance at slow speeds. Above 25MPH, the boats feel very similar. To be fair, the Sceptre is set-up better with a 4 blade prop and tabs. I will change the prop on the CC and add tabs, and expect the boat to plane better.
Of course, the Sceptre has more weight up front so its not an apples to apples comparison. In addition, the Mercury 200EFI on the Sceptre is also much lighter compared to the 250HPDI. Interestingly, for the boating that I do, the 50 extra horsepower are not immediately felt. Yes, the top speed of the CC is higher (48MPH vs 41MPH for the Scpetre), and yes the 200 EFI has to turn more RPM at cruise - but both boats feel perfectly happy at 30MPH where I find myself most of the time when conditions allow. I think the new Mercury V6 225 would be about perfect for a repower.
The bracket is really nice for improving cockpit space, reducing motor noise in the cockpit and is very convenient as a swimming platform.



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2020, 07:06 AM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

You have 2 fine SeaCrafts there!
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2020, 08:53 AM
Capt Chuck's Avatar
Capt Chuck Capt Chuck is offline
gucci
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sailfish Capital, fla
Posts: 2,804
Default

Who did the rebuild on the green CC?
I would like to see more pictures, especially that hidden console
Could this one be another candidate of the GUCCI STAMP?
__________________


1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP --------



as "Americans" you have the right to ......
"LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2020, 10:10 AM
whistler whistler is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 27
Default

Thank you.

The green Seacraft was redone by SMS Customs in FL in 2008. As I understand it, SMS no longer does custom work. The boat was redone in a very "gucciesque" style with emphasis on sandbar and not fishing. That said, the underlying structural work appears to be very well done: the sole is vacuum bagged foam, the transom is solid as a rock, and the attention to detail is not just skin deep. I do not know for sure, but it appears that the bracket and maybe the transom redo were done by Hermco. I plan to tone down the "gucci" and add back the fishing and utility

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2020, 10:33 AM
strick strick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Chuck View Post
Who did the rebuild on the green CC?
I would like to see more pictures, especially that hidden console
Could this one be another candidate of the GUCCI STAMP?
First thing I did was right click and save..

Quote:
Originally Posted by whistler View Post
I have owned a '78 Sceptre 23 with a transom mounted outboard for 5 years. I just purchased a '78 23 CC with a bracket mounted outboard. Since questions about adding a bracket are pretty common, I wanted to share my impressions of the handling/performance differences in these 2 boats.
So which do you prefer? it's kinda hard comparing the CC to the sceptre... the CC will always feel like a better ride better due to operator positioning while underway...then throw in the bracket on the cc and it would put you right about in the middle of the sceptre where the step down is into the cabin..

I've always said my old 23cc handled better without the bracket..pluses and minuses for everything we do...

Nice Boat!

strick
__________________
"I always wanted to piss in the Rhine" (General George Patton upon entering Germany)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2020, 12:24 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

I had it both ways on my Tsunami and his comparison is pretty fair. Trim response, planing and overall handling is better with the motor on the transom but speed, fuel economy, room and the benefit of a closed transom is a nice trade off with a bracket.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2020, 11:05 AM
whistler whistler is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 27
Default

So far, I prefer the layout of the CC and love the extra room, and convenience offered by the closed transom. I am now sold on engine brackets - when done correctly. So far, the Sceptre performs better but to be fair - I have spent time setting it up correctly. I raised the engine, changed out the prop, and added tabs. Going from a Mercury Enertia Plus to a Rev 4 did wonders for the Sceptre! I am hoping that by doing the same with the CC, I can improve the hole shot and low speed performance/attitude.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2020, 11:33 AM
Snookerd Snookerd is offline
Founding Father
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,658
Default

I’ve had a bracketed 23SF and I currently have a transom mounted 23 Sceptre. I definitely enjoyed the speed and safety of the closed transom with the bracketed boat. Two observations:

1. Being caught offshore in a tight 3 ft gulfstream chop with the transom mounted sceptre, I was able to keep the bow up at planning speed which was only 12-13 MPH. That low speed made the ride easy even though the sea was picking up.

2. Also, a year ago when we crossed over the Bahamas, I spent close to three hours driving with Don V (transom mounted 23SF) and Briguy (Bracketed 23SF). The running attitudes were noticeably different.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Snookerd
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-09-2020, 08:03 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whistler View Post
So far, I prefer the layout of the CC and love the extra room, and convenience offered by the closed transom. I am now sold on engine brackets - when done correctly. So far, the Sceptre performs better but to be fair - I have spent time setting it up correctly. I raised the engine, changed out the prop, and added tabs. Going from a Mercury Enertia Plus to a Rev 4 did wonders for the Sceptre! I am hoping that by doing the same with the CC, I can improve the hole shot and low speed performance/attitude.
Yes you can. People always talk about pitch, rpms, and wot which is all fine and good,
but, prop design is sooooo important for our hulls.

When I first got my lil `89 Slacker 20 with a 150 carb rude 375 lbs on her transom, I could not plane below 18-20 at all. Trimmed in, the bow would rise quickly and I would lose the horizon.

The poor thing porpoised to beat the band. The prop was a 14.75x17p Mich. Match.
A 3 bl house mouse eared prop. I used to see a 20 Seafari I/O almost every time going
out LWI with a single? mom and 2 cute little kids. I would have to pass her as I launched
and pounded my way out the cut. She was holding 12 easily. I was not happy at all.

Big Shrimpin` suggested I try a Mirage + so I found a 15.380x17p.

What happened in the middle of the night?
It was not Christmas. I did not awaken to three ghosts.

Someone had stolen my boat, taken her to Santa`s workshop
and returned her without me being any the wiser.

I hit the binnie and whoa. Very little bow rise. My ass lifted and she just screwed.
No porpoising. Someone had played a trick on me and I was going to find the elf
who was responsible for these shenanigans pronto Tonto.

Denny and I tested many props shortly thereafter. Apollo 4 bl 14.75 x 20,
PT ofs 4 bl 15x15, and the Mirage +, were among the standouts.

76 Red suggested a SST 1 3bl many moons ago. I shrugged this off as not being
serious at all. I now run a 15x16p and can hold plane at 2700 rpm easily.
12 mph all day. I wonder if this is part of the 2 stroke factory exhaust design.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2020, 07:26 PM
oz775 oz775 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 129
Default

is scepter for sale?
__________________
1974 Tsunami- 2004 Merc 225 Opti on bracket
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft