Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old 02-22-2016, 01:50 AM
FishStretcher FishStretcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,117
Default

You will likely find that non ethanol fuel makes more power above 5000 rpm. It does in my car (but it it lightly turbocharged). 91 non ethanol makes more power at high rpm than 93 E10. Otherwise, power is the same. This in a car with a knock sensor. I'd suspect a EFI merc I/O or a supercharged outboard would be the most similar as they have knock sensors.

But the knock sensor retards timing to make power. Not remove it. Less high rpm advance means less negative work means more power.

It appears from the data I collected that E10 burns a lot more slowly than non ethanol. With a lot more advance and LESS power above 5000 RPM.

Anyways at cruise, differences should be minimal. But rec 90 or 91 Mogas is likely ideal for outboards if I extrapolate my data.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft