Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-12-2016, 08:46 PM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default Effect of I/O vs. OB on 25 Seafari CG

In the thread about the 25 for sale in CT, Connor was wondering about what happens to the CG of a 25 when you replace the I/O with a big outboard on the transom. Since I have modeled Seacraft hulls in 3D CAD software I decided to do a quick study on this. He was heading to the Bahamas for a bit and didn’t get a chance to make measurements before he left so I looked at a few photos and the spec drawings and roughed out a 3D model – it isn’t complete or exact but it works for this simple analysis and the Solidworks software does a good job of calculating the CG using weights and densities.

For the I/O engine I used a 5.7 model that I have and adjusted the weight to represent having iron manifolds. For the I/O drive I used a Bravo 1X model. Total I/O weight 974 lbs. which corresponds to a 5.7 Bravo. For the OB I used a DF300 Suzuki 30” at 627 lbs.
Both drives were set 2” up from the bottom and the OB was set on the transom.
I modeled the bare hull with hollow stringers but nothing else. Since I did not model the liner I increased the hull thickness to 0.38” so that it could roughly represent the mass of the hull with a liner. I modeled the cap as just fiberglass with no coring. The windshield framing is just solid aluminum to represent the frame with glass. I did not change the transom between the two versions since I figured about as much glass/core mass would go back in for a OB as comes out from the I/O.
Here is a side view of the I/O with the CG shown.
Name:  25IO.jpg
Views: 141
Size:  39.3 KB
Here is a side view of the OB with the CG shown.
Name:  25OB.jpg
Views: 139
Size:  42.4 KB
I was shocked that this indicates the CG with the OB is 0.2” AFT and 4.5” up from the I/O CG. I expected it to go up and forward a few inches. I know the actual location of the CG with this crude model is only generally representative but the difference between the CG locations should be a good indicator of the effect - even though I doubt it is accurate to better than an inch - if that.

I can make the model more accurate and add a liner if someone has dimensions and wants to use it to plan a rebuild.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft