Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 10-11-2016, 11:59 AM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

I think outboards would be a LOT more expensive than staying with an I/O. If they were mounted on transom, balance would probably be ok although shifted aft a bit relative to the I/O, but cutting the transom to mount outboards and building a splashwell would also be BIG job and not retain the configuration Gillie likes.

Would not recommend a bracketed outboard like Brian used, as it would significantly change balance of the boat. In addition to adding the bracket, he also removed the windshield and big fiberglass seats up front to install a CC, further increasing the aft CG shift. One of the video's he posted of the boat running in a light chop showed some porpoising which the stock boat NEVER did. The bow on the stock configuration Unohu and Island Trader's 21 hardly bounced at all in 2-3' seas, so I've concluded that those mods adversely affected the balance and ride of the boat. I think Gillie is on the right track in staying with the I/O. Only question is whether a modified I-6 or stock V-8 is the most cost effective route.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft