Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2015, 10:38 PM
Scott1115 Scott1115 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 29
Default 1998 23SC info needed please

Please give me some insight to the 1998 23' SC.

I believe these were produced by Tracker, but not sure. It might have been made in the Miami plant by the original fabricators but recently purchased by tracker. Trying to find out if there's wood (or not) in the boat. Any problems known with this vintage? Anything specific to look at or be concerned with? How's the bilge access?

I know the SC23 is known for it's great ride...weather and seas permitting, is this boat NE offshore capable (60-70NM)? I have a valise raft, EPIRB, sat phone. etc...and usually buddy-boat with others.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2015, 08:49 PM
Scott1115 Scott1115 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 29
Default

Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2015, 07:16 AM
Old'sCool Old'sCool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,122
Default

23 is quite capable but the range is obviously fuel dependant. Sounds like you have all the safety gear. Buddy boat is optional in my opinion. My 23 is 25 yrs older so no comment on that year but the hull surface is the same while construction/deck layout is different. Our off shore trips average ~160 nm roundtrip burning ~75 gals with Yam 250 2S.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2015, 08:03 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Yes there is wood but we all have it and for the most part we all have to deal with wood issues sooner or later. The 23 is one of the best of its size class out there. Easy to trailer, and a 250 will give you all the power you will ever need but a 200 does fine. They are renowned as you know for a very good ride in a moderate sea and for most handle a 2-4 foot seas very well depending on wave interval. Anything up to 6" can be daunting but survivable and above that I go golfing. With modern outboard power you can bank on at least 2 nautical mpg and I've heard if you go with an Etec you can leave port with a half a tank and return with a full one...

How far you trust one offshore is limited to the captain and fuel capacity. While some here may argue this, the 23 does not have magical powers that defy the laws of hydrodynamics and allows you to run with 50'+ sport fishes. If you pick your days it will exceed your expectations and leave most other 23s floundering in your wake with spilled coffee and tackle scattered all over their deck.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:40 PM
Scott1115 Scott1115 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 29
Default

I can deal with wood. I was unsure as I've heard this hull does and does not.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2015, 11:07 PM
SteveH SteveH is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 90
Default

my current 23 is two years newer….no wood. Mine has been a great boat. When I installed my thru hull transducer a few years back, I drilled a hole out of the bottom which was approx three-eights to one-half thick. The older Potter built hulls had a bit more glass. Nonetheless I have been very happy with my Tracker built hull.
__________________
Steve

1978 20 ft. Master Angler (175 merc)
2000 23 ft. Seacraft (225 opti)
1984 17ft. Boston Whaler (90 merc)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2015, 11:34 PM
ocuyler ocuyler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 44.41 -75.79
Posts: 1,490
Default

These are all very good reply, which I agree with.
__________________
Otto
And yes, I still believe in the four boat theory...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2015, 06:58 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveH View Post
my current 23 is two years newer….no wood. Mine has been a great boat. When I installed my thru hull transducer a few years back, I drilled a hole out of the bottom which was approx three-eights to one-half thick. The older Potter built hulls had a bit more glass. Nonetheless I have been very happy with my Tracker built hull.
the Tracker hull has composite floors and transom?
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2015, 02:25 PM
PigSticker PigSticker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Boynton Beach Fl
Posts: 156
Default

Yes the late 90s on up do, but the late 80s trackers are wood
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2015, 12:02 PM
bigtahuna bigtahuna is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Default

The '98s were built by Silver King and are wood free with a composite transom. I've owned my '98 for ten years and have been very happy with my little tank.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft