Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-28-2014, 07:39 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave2400 View Post
ops ops my boob i should have sead my outboard is a 125 force with a 20inch shaft sorry a.t.b dave
The last of the V8 interceptors.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-01-2014, 11:44 AM
Blue_Heron Blue_Heron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gator Country
Posts: 1,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave2400 View Post
...from looking at the brackets on here that the likes off outhers on here have made it looks thay slant from the transom to transom what is that slant allso how deep is the v in the bottom....
The geometry of the bracket will be dictated by the geometry of your boat, so it may not be the same as for a Seacraft. For the fore and aft angles, measure the angle between your keel and transom. For the deadrise, you will also want to match your hull.

You can use plywood and glass construction if you like, but you really should use epoxy resin if you go that route. If you use strick's one-off mould method, you can use less expensive polyester resin, you'll have much less fairing to make it look professionally done, and it will be lighter and stronger. The method is tried and true, whereas the plywood/glass approach is a reinvention of the wheel unless you have a professionally designed solution.

Dave
__________________
Blue Heron Boat Works
Reinventing the wheel, one spoke at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-01-2014, 03:26 PM
dave2400 dave2400 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Heron View Post
The geometry of the bracket will be dictated by the geometry of your boat, so it may not be the same as for a Seacraft. For the fore and aft angles, measure the angle between your keel and transom. For the deadrise, you will also want to match your hull.

You can use plywood and glass construction if you like, but you really should use epoxy resin if you go that route. If you use strick's one-off mould method, you can use less expensive polyester resin, you'll have much less fairing to make it look professionally done, and it will be lighter and stronger. The method is tried and true, whereas the plywood/glass approach is a reinvention of the wheel unless you have a professionally designed solution.

Dave
dave it was not the transom angles i was onabout but the the angle from front to to back off the bracket i take onboard what you say about the geomery of boats not being the same but like i sead i reply to your last post if you look a the link in the reply to me by mr mcgillcardy you will sea there is not a lot off deferance in the hunt18 and the seacraft infact the seacraft 18 might be the hunt 18 sister
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-01-2014, 05:49 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave2400 View Post
hi thanks for that i take onboard what you say about the shape and floatation but what about the 1inch per foot off setback is that ontop of fitting the bracket 2inch above the bottom off the hull or do you fit it 2inch above the bottom off the hull and then 1inch per foot off setback a.t.b dave
Dave, I think the 1"/foot of setback is the often used rule of thumb for height of the motors anti ventilation plate above the keel. In my experience, it needs to be more than that. The engine makers say that the top of AV plate needs to be above the water when you're up on plane with motor trimmed out as far as you normally run. My bracket has a 2.5' setback, so that rule of thumb says my AV plate should be 2.5" above keel. However as you can see in attached pic, it's 3.25" above the metal rail extending aft from keel. I have since raised it to 4.25" and AV plate is STILL underwater, so it needs to come up about another inch! Therefore in my own experience that trade factor would seem to be about 5.25"/2.5' or roughly 2" per foot of setback!
Attached Images
 
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-02-2014, 03:24 PM
dave2400 dave2400 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwacker View Post
Dave, I think the 1"/foot of setback is the often used rule of thumb for height of the motors anti ventilation plate above the keel. In my experience, it needs to be more than that. The engine makers say that the top of AV plate needs to be above the water when you're up on plane with motor trimmed out as far as you normally run. My bracket has a 2.5' setback, so that rule of thumb says my AV plate should be 2.5" above keel. However as you can see in attached pic, it's 3.25" above the metal rail extending aft from keel. I have since raised it to 4.25" and AV plate is STILL underwater, so it needs to come up about another inch! Therefore in my own experience that trade factor would seem to be about 5.25"/2.5' or roughly 2" per foot of setback!
thanks bushwacker that makes it mutch clearer dave2400
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft