Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2017, 10:54 PM
TBubrick TBubrick is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 26
Default I/O vs outboard hull for project

Considering a project 23 sceptre or tsunami configuration. I anticipate a rather major rebuild. Today I spoke with a marine shop here and was advised not to consider an I/O hull due to the weight distribution and the associated challenges of putting an outboard on a bracket. It seems as I casually look on Craigslist there are many more I/O hulls at reasonable prices than outboard versions.

I'd assumed the transom would be rebuilt and closed in either way, so heck...the deck rebuilt, new fuel tanks, etc.

Are there differences in the weight distribution of the hull based on the power configuration?

My question is this challenge a small one or a large one. The owner said the balancing would be more challenging.

I hope this question is not too simple minded...as I'm new to this adventure

thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2017, 02:00 AM
CoreyTrx CoreyTrx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 161
Default

If you are going to put a bracket on then I would definitely say an I/o. That's what I did. The transom is already close for you and the cap goes all the way across. If you are rebuilding it anyway you can add some knees if you want to.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:12 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

CG on a Tsunami is already way forward than optimum so I wouldn't worry about an I/O hull being any more of a problem.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2017, 06:48 PM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default

Interesting -- has anyone figured what the weight of a small block check with the exhaust. Manifolds risers intermediate housing and out drive are in contrast to a aluminum twin engine bracket and large outboard I'd think the weight distribution might be closer than you think
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2017, 08:49 AM
bigeasy1 bigeasy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: western massachusetts
Posts: 1,048
Default

I agree with Corey and Moose.
The I/O hull solves the glasswork on the stern for you, with the benefit of an already closed transom.If you do the transom from the inside, by cutting the rear cap and back panel, you will expose the whole inner transom surface and make it fairly easy to add knees and to install any kind of backing plates when attaching the bracket.
I did this with my Tsunami but I kept it with the I/O .
If I remember right I think the Mercrusier 350 260 hp with the Alpha drive in my boat weighs in around 1000 pounds give or take a bit.
__________________
All this,just for a boat ride
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft