Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2014, 10:44 PM
foghornleghorn foghornleghorn is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1
Default SeaCraft 20 superfisherman vs Grady white Tournament 224 in following sea

I am considering a killer deal on a Grady with Twin e-tec 115's and am wondering how the Seacraft compares in a following sea.

I currently have a 20 Superfisherman with an Evinrude 175 OceanPro, it's pretty robust for the hull. Seems to handle well in a following sea, but I'm no boat design connoisseur.

Any experience is helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2014, 11:07 PM
Billpotter Billpotter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 51
Default

The longitudinal vertical surfaces between the different dead rises on the SC hull help a lot with tracking in all conditions I've been in - I'd put the SC hull up against any comparable sized hull I've ridden in/ run as far as tracking goes.
__________________
Bill Potter

18' 1978, Yamaha 130
23' CC 1986, T Suzuki F115s (current full custom project)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2014, 08:33 AM
Tiny Tiny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 211
Default

We had a 226 with an sv2 hull, honestly, overall build quality was fantastic, however, there were a lot of gelcoat voids...I digress. IMHO we bottom fish a lot an the boat pitched significantly and the ride, although good was nothing seacraft like.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2015, 07:36 PM
seakat seakat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ct
Posts: 32
Default

I had a SC20 and found it a bit dainty in the rips. I stepped up to a SC23 and am so impressed with its performance in heavy seas. The 20 was a great boat, but at 19'6" and fine lines, it was not a big water boat, in my opinion. I want to be able to make regular runs to Montauk and Block.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2015, 08:27 PM
thehermit thehermit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chatham, MA
Posts: 777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seakat View Post
I had a SC20 and found it a bit dainty in the rips. I stepped up to a SC23 and am so impressed with its performance in heavy seas. The 20 was a great boat, but at 19'6" and fine lines, it was not a big water boat, in my opinion. I want to be able to make regular runs to Montauk and Block.
While I completely agree on the above....my 20 was an absolute blast to run and was very duable an comfortable for its size. The 23 is just a whole different animal.
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________
1974 23SF
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-24-2015, 09:29 PM
Terry England Terry England is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida
Posts: 895
Default G/W w/ 115 Etec's

Ah say, Ah say, Ah say Foghorn,
She'll go a little north of 40 and get at least 1.8 MPG at that speed. Ease it back to 4,150 "just up on the pipes" and it will probably get at least 2.2 MPG. At 1,500 it will make 8 knots and get 7 miles to the gallon. A Grady is not a Seacraft, however C. Raymond Hunt's deep V Bertram and Alim Step-lift hulls raced Carl Moesly's Seacraft VDH hulls for most of the 60's. There are a lot worse choices than a Grady, but be sure to get a thick seat cushion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft