Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91  
Old 06-18-2017, 03:37 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default 17P Package

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigshrimpin View Post
Tried a powertech 15P four blade OFS and lost 3.5 - 4mph on the top end . . . could only turn 5250rpm @ 35.5mph. 15p enertia is WAY better. Terry the 17P is packaged up and will go out tomorrow.
Bigshrimpin- Thanks for the update. Was killing time yesterday and looked atSeaCraft on THT. Saw some responses from you, Snookerd and others which were a pretty good defense of SeaCraft, Moesly and Potter. Had forgotten that I found THT pretty irritating- almost like political argueing!
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 06-27-2017, 08:56 PM
Briguy Briguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sarasota, Fl
Posts: 976
Default

When I had my twin 115 Suzuki's I tested my performance with one motor. Now this is with stainless 22" props. My best speed with one motor was about 14 knots at 4400 with tabs all the way down. If I dropped down to a 18" I have now doubt speed would have been 25 mph or so at 6k.

Congrats for being a guinea pig. I'm sure MPG at best may be over 4.00.

A homeless guy in Bradenton had some kind of flybridge wellcraft or whatever IO. NO IB motor and he ran a 40hp Yamaha on a home made bracket. I swear he was on plane doing about 15 when I saw him.

All about propping.
__________________
Capt. Brian

Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 06-27-2017, 10:07 PM
Snookerd Snookerd is offline
Founding Father
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,658
Default Propping and motor height

Tim-Nice efficiency and one heck of a contribution by Mercury with that 150. That motor is awesome.

Running over 600 miles last 2 weeks in different sea conditions...it was amazing to trim the boat where the boat has the SC ride on top vs more of the harder landing due to more running surface on the water and improper running angle. I could watch the efficiency improve on the gauge. No spray when trimmed to ride on top! It had that woosh landing!
__________________
Snookerd
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 07-08-2017, 07:59 PM
3rdday 3rdday is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 454
Default single 150 on 23

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Chuck View Post
CAREFUL, Depending on your load and sea conditions, you'll be shifting your passengers to the bow cap to stay on plane !
Capt Chuck is On Point - I rented a sailfish 22 with a 150 yammie 4 stroke while in the keys , would not get up on plane with 4 people, gear and full fuel . We had to have folks run to the bow to get up on plane.
__________________
I heard it on the coconut telegraph..........
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 07-08-2017, 09:36 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

We are such prop centric folks here.
I love prop testing.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 07-08-2017, 09:48 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rdday View Post
Capt Chuck is On Point - I rented a sailfish 22 with a 150 yammie 4 stroke while in the keys , would not get up on plane with 4 people, gear and full fuel . We had to have folks run to the bow to get up on plane.
Already tested this with full fuel tank, 4 adults over 200lbs with everyone behind the console. The boat jumps right up on plane. Just did a 120 mile trip a few days ago . . . with 3 guys 90 gallons, gear, full baitwell (35 gallons). Merc 150 makes max torque at 3000rpm vs. yamaha 150 which peaks at 5400rpm.

http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=28868

Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-15-2017, 01:45 PM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

Bump for update and thoughts now that you have more hours on it. Any regrets or anything that you would do differently?

Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-15-2017, 09:43 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

132 hours on the motor so far. I regret driving from Onset to Chatham and back (in 25+ knot wsw wind) and leaving 10 minutes before the bite turned on. I took a beating coming home across nantucket sound. I also towed a guy from Squibnocket to Quicks Hole (who didn't have seatow) had to cancel dinner reservations. The engine has been awesome and exceeded all my expectations.

Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 10-15-2017, 10:38 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

I got out in some hurricane swells too, and the engine just chugs along happily.

Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 10-16-2017, 01:41 PM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

Great news!

The cost and simplicity makes it a great choice. Thank you for sharing!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft