Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-25-2006, 08:42 PM
Miles Offshore Miles Offshore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

back in the eighties a lot of folks down my way were putting big blocks (454's) in both their inboards and i/o's. Bottom line was too much weight and i dont know if there are any left around here with that configuration. i would also make sure you had the heavy dutier gear than its sister- i dont remember the series off hand- with that lighter weight and all those extra horses she ought to run good. I dont think the pocket drive inboards can handle 40 knots though either. Maybe gary will chime in here-
__________________
"Lifes too short to own an ugly boat"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-27-2006, 04:05 PM
lost2a6 lost2a6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hurley, Mississippi
Posts: 386
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

One thing to remember is if it's raw water-cooled then you will need to use brass freeze plugs. Also you would really need to watch your sustained RPM's being a 383 has such a long stroke (same stroke as a SB 400). My dad put a couple of small block 400's in a 31ft Baha fishing boat and they held up pretty good but the guy seldom ran them over 3200 RPMs.
__________________
Steve B
1978 23ft SeaCraft Seavette 502HP ZZ502 Mercruiser TRS Drive-Sold-UGH!
1998 28ft Carolina Classic 7.4 Volvo Penta Duo Prop
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-27-2006, 08:52 PM
RODMAN RODMAN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Home Port Chatham
Posts: 161
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

Also a hot rod engine has to be torn down and refresh every so often. They use thin rings to prevent breakage,but wear out faster but can handle the revs,less drag on the cylinder wall= More HP.And you would have to use a higher grade of gas.My choice would be a stock engine.Will give you more hours and the best bang for your buck.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:46 AM
wendell wendell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

Thanks for the replies. It's a little dangerous to toss around terms like "hot rod engine". I'm talking about a mild 383 with a standard ring pack, little hydro-roller cam and a pair of vortex heads. Not exactly ground braking. A motor like this could live and make max power at 3200rpm for life times. That said, it may very well not be needed. A GM crate long block w/ the existing accesories might serve the purpose. Time will tell. I'll have the boat in my shop today or tomorrow and will go from there.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-29-2006, 08:13 AM
Gary Hill Gary Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portsmouth, Va.
Posts: 138
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

I have a Marine Power 350 HP (CARB), and max speed is 37, I don't have to worry about trouble shooting this motor because I can figure it out like I always have. I have a friend with a throttle body and he spent around two weeks replacing everything until it was right again. Also you will require a return line for gas since it's around 42 lbs of pressure. The same guy had a red 76 454 with a lot of HP and it would run around 50, but wasn't really good over 40 mph.
__________________
GARY
76 SEACRAFT CC INBOARD
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-29-2006, 09:04 AM
wendell wendell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

Thanks for the info. The goal is for this boat to cruise between 25-30 and be as fuel effient as possible while sticking with a carb. I figured that the low rpm torque of a 383 would be a good fit. Conversely, I bet a ZZ crate long block from GM would get us to the same goal.

Last I heard, the boat and her owner had been sitting behind a rolled over semi for 2 hours and the highway patrol were predicting another 4! Fun way to spend the night.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-31-2006, 07:58 AM
Gary Hill Gary Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portsmouth, Va.
Posts: 138
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

I had a friend who is also a marine mechanic who put a car motor in for a guy and it took forever to get the rpm's and it running right, he swear's he would not do that again.
__________________
GARY
76 SEACRAFT CC INBOARD
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-01-2006, 02:26 PM
spareparts spareparts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 66
Default Re: MARINE INBOARD VS. REGULAR SMALL BLOCK

the GM HT383 engiine should be perfect for use in an inboard aplication, its tailored for a flat tourque curve( just what you want in an inboard engine), can't understand why Mercury continually builds its own 383 out of 5.7 engines rather than use the HT383
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft