23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy

[77SceptreOB]

Until NoBones came along.

I resemble that remark!

[eggsuckindog]

Although deep V is a great hull in rough water say for racing, I'm sure its drawbacks are what prompted Carl to actually design the VDH to overcome them without giving up the rough water ride, just speculating - but it does. As stated when dealing with older boats the stringers are what makes the old SeaCrafts doable - no stringer issues at least. With 250hp and up the Sceptre is a hell of a boat, very fast but still very fishable, both have good name recognition.
Keep in mind the deep V will require more HP at a cruise speed of say 30, that was another selling point for the VDH

[strick]

compare everything....

I cant compare ride because I have never rode in one but I can compare construction because I have been deep into the bowels of both. Aside from the thickness of the main hull shell there is no other similarities. The construction of the stingers, decks, fish boxes, etc... is much better in a SeaCraft. The SeaCraft was built to last.

strick

[NoBones]

I resemble that remark!

OK Jim, Just to keep these kill joys happy,
you owe me a $1.00 [img]/forum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Then it was not free, title work fee we could call it!

See ya, Ken

[77SceptreOB]

OK Jim, Just to keep these kill joys happy,
you owe me a $1.00 [img]/forum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Then it was not free, title work fee we could call it!

See ya, Ken

DONE! $1.00 sent via PayPal! So, now your NOT single-handedly ruining the SeaCraft resale "market" LOL.

[NoBones]

Thanks Jim,

Payment received!!

See ya, Ken

[cdavisdb]

I've run a lot in three 23 formulas, two short decks and one long deck, two were Don Arrnow boats, which are quite a bit heavier than the later versions and one was an early Thunderbird. All three were fabulous running back and forth to Bimini. However, very very wet boats and roll was an issue. Most of the time it wasn't bad, but every now and then that hull develops a vicious snap roll, almost throw you out of the boat. The long deck seemed worse in this respect.

I can't compare to a 23 Seacraft, never been in one, but compared to the 25 Seafari, ride is similar, I think the seafari is a little better, the 25 is very very dry, roll is a little less and I have not seen a snap roll yet. Would not be surprized if the 25 developed a snap roll in the wrong chop.

[Fr. Frank]

I've run a lot in three 23 formulas, two short decks and one long deck, two were Don Arrnow boats, which are quite a bit heavier than the later versions and one was an early Thunderbird. All three were fabulous running back and forth to Bimini. However, very very wet boats and roll was an issue. Most of the time it wasn't bad, but every now and then that hull develops a vicious snap roll, almost throw you out of the boat. The long deck seemed worse in this respect.

Went for a ride in a racing model 233 Formula with twin small-block 350/350's with Arneson drives back in '86. We hit a cross chop at about 74-75 mph and I though for a moment we were going to do a complete barrel roll. We ended up hooking and nearly swamping as we came to a sudden stop. Even with racing bolsters, I had a livid bruise from under my armpit to my pelvis for a couple of weeks.

They will indeed snap-roll in the right (or wrong) conditions, especially if you hook the bow a bit.

[76Savage]

Jim,

Did you just spend 50 cents of my money?