Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-08-2018, 09:33 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

Foam outside stringers was a nice mix of wet and dry. Found this one crack in the starboard stinger where the rigging channel meets up by the fuel coffin. Otherwise demo is coming along quick and painless
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-20-2018, 10:35 AM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

Not so quick question. What is the best way of determining the new deck level along the sides of the boat? Port stringer is 3/8" to 1/2" lower in places than starboard. Boat is level on trailer. I cannot simply measure up from the chine since the glass on the hull differs in height by 3/8" a long the way and differs by 1/2 from port and starboard? Any tips? I have a straight 2x4 ripped to my finished deck height should I just level that up across stringers and make a mark on gunnel? I need an accurate line along gunnel to set my cleats for the edge of the deck. I am going to reuse the original fishbox/casting deck which was only held in by the drain fitting.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-20-2018, 01:14 PM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

I used a lazer level to make my marks.

http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...1&d=1524244442
Attached Images
 
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-20-2018, 01:15 PM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

I'm thinking more and more the orientation problem with the pics is due to which way you rotate the phone camera when taking the pic. Some are right and some are not.
The line doesn't look straight due to the angle the photo was taken. It was dead on when I cut the deck coring.
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 02-01-2019, 10:15 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

I lost my notes and need a measurement. From the rear bulkhead on either side of motor well to stern edge of console. 78 master angler 20.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 02-01-2019, 11:35 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

Never mind it's even with the back edge of the bow rail recess.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:32 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

thanks Vezo. i am at a point now where i have my new sole pieces cut and ready to go down.

during demo i removed the rotted wood blocks around the straight down scuppers. i want to redo them with the cross tube Moesly method but i am unsure if i really want a 90 degree thru hull on the bottom of the boat on both sides.

should i just re create the potter style blocks and run a long brass tube through it flared on both ends like a long transom drain? like mcgillicuddy did?

the ones i pulled out during demo were like really long 2 piece splashwell drains
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 02-17-2019, 12:35 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Just wrote all of this, hit proofread, preview post, and was freaking logged out!!!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 02-17-2019, 12:48 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Try again.

My ‘79 MA purchased in ‘96, required a new transom and repower in ‘99. CSC was not founded until 2002, so I rebuilt mine to 20”. Bad idea.

Fortunately I found a competent glass guy to use marine plywood and rebuild from inside. He’s dead now. Unfortunately, neither of us understood Mr. Mosely’s theory of cross over floor drains, so we scrapped it, allowing vertical drains to flush into the bilge. Bad idea number 2.

I have replaced brass drain tubes in early Boston Whaler Sports, and the process, with the tool, measuring, heating and annealing is not fun.

If I were you I’d go back to original design because it simply works. On my Seafari, the vertical floor drains go through hull, with wedges forward, causing a Venturi effect while underway. Plugs in while fishing (weight in stern), pulled on plane and when at rest at the dock. Must be the additional weight of the cap that allows this versus a CC. A very nice feature. Hope this helps.

Disclaimer: I am a Disabled firefighter. I am not an aero/naughtical engineer, nor understand advanced physics. However, I do read CSC daily, whether logged in or out!?!

Michael.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 02-17-2019, 12:50 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I did not DARE preview all of that again. Sorry for the disrespect Mr. Moesly. Auto correct from my contacts of a friend who spells it differently.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft