Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81  
Old 06-05-2017, 10:07 AM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

How does it compare to the 2.4 liter 2 stroke? Any regrets at this stage? How does it do with a heavy load?
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 06-05-2017, 10:25 AM
CaptLloyd CaptLloyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Satellite Beach, FL
Posts: 375
Default

Nice performance numbers!

What do you figure is the fuel burn difference from the 175?
__________________
1973 Seacraft 20' SF "Sea Dog"
1988 Tracker/Seacraft 23' WA "Salty Dog"
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 06-05-2017, 12:07 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

I installed a square smartcraft system monitor gauge.
Fuel burn with 2 people/full tank and gear (raft, survival suits, fishing gear, 125lbs of ice) 4600rpm is 9gph @ 30/31mph. 4600 is the happy cruise in light chop. In slop it does nice 3800/4000 = 24/25 mph roughly 6.5gph. At low speeds this engine is more efficient than the 2.4L 175.
I'm super happy. This is perfect for my needs. If I had to carry bigger loads regularly or wanted more speed, then I would suggest a bigger engine.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 06-12-2017, 08:39 AM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

Great numbers but 6.5mpg doesnt seem possible. Maybe 3.2mpg?

https://www.mercurymarine.com/en/us/...units=imperial
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 06-12-2017, 09:11 AM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

thanks CB - that was a typo. 6.5 GPH is what is should be . . . made the correction. fuel burn and speed is nearly identical to the sailfish 220 pdf.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 06-12-2017, 10:05 AM
captbone captbone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Default

I am thrilled your set up works as expected. Nice package all around for simplicity, affordability, economy and performance. I would expect that your engine rigged out the door is 50% of what a 250hp Yamaha repower would cost.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 06-12-2017, 10:48 AM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captbone View Post
I am thrilled your set up works as expected. Nice package all around for simplicity, affordability, economy and performance. I would expect that your engine rigged out the door is 50% of what a 250hp Yamaha repower would cost.
NO doubt!!!
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 06-12-2017, 12:23 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default Sent PM to Bigshrimpin

Bigshrimpin-
Hi. Sent you a PM as a followup to an old discussion.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 06-12-2017, 04:58 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

Terry - pm replied . . . Sent you 2 messages
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 06-18-2017, 02:12 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

Tried a powertech 15P four blade OFS and lost 3.5 - 4mph on the top end . . . could only turn 5250rpm @ 35.5mph. 15p enertia is WAY better. Terry the 17P is packaged up and will go out tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft