#1
|
|||
|
|||
23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
compare everything....
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
Same number of letters
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
Deep V (24 deg.) vs. VDH (21 deg. avg.)
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
One has an extra 3 in the name. Must be important.
I have seen formulas given away for free, but never a seacraft. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
ride in 3 ft chop? fuel burn? wetness in ride? drift?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
Quote:
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140 1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50 http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
Even more of a copied hull than an SC, great running deep heavier hull. I'd take an SC personally, much less roll running and drifting. In a head sea the Formula may run a little better if you tried to run the boats the same way, but I am not a fan of a boat that tries to ride through waves and not over them, heck even on larger boats I don't like it.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
Here's a link I came across when I was considering a 68 233 before I decided I couldn't put it or a Sceptre with my T100.
Note the difference in the stringers and bulkhead structures: http://formula23.blogspot.com/2004_06_01_archive.html
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
hard to find formula's that don't have the stringers rotted out..if there fixed there asking big $$
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 23 Sceptre vs formula 233 cuddy
I had a Formula 23 center console and it was a good ride in a head sea but was really wet. They also roll quite a bit when drifting. They don't handle as well as a Seacraft.
|
|
|