Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2015, 08:08 PM
cadeco cadeco is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 29
Default What about the 25" Motor ?

I have read many posts from people tha had brackets installed on the Seacrafts, many times they say that they had to raise the motors (they were using 25" motors) in order to run perfect. Why can't a 20" motor be used instead of the 25" to solve this issue, one aspect of it would be cost since looks to me that 20" are cheaper then their 25" counterparts. Can someone clarify it to mew? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-21-2015, 09:02 AM
Old'sCool Old'sCool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,122
Default

My '23 w Hermco required a 30" for single or 25" for twins
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-21-2015, 01:53 PM
cadeco cadeco is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 29
Default

That's another question: Why it happens?

I guess that installing a bracket is something like " Do whatever you want!" and latter find out how to deal w/ it.

Yes as i said before i have seen a couple of posts from guys saying that they had to raise the motor a lot and in some of those posts even going to the last bolt, they feel that it should go up even more. That's why i asked the question: 20" shafts are ( in comparison) cheaper then 25" and so, why not?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-21-2015, 09:40 PM
Bigshrimpin Bigshrimpin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Onset, MA
Posts: 2,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadeco View Post
I have read many posts from people tha had brackets installed on the Seacrafts, many times they say that they had to raise the motors (they were using 25" motors) in order to run perfect. Why can't a 20" motor be used instead of the 25" to solve this issue . . . Can someone clarify it to mew? Thanks
You can with some brackets . . . but it depends on the dimensions. For example if the depth of the bracket is 25" (designed for 30" motors) and you mount a single 20" shaft outboard on the bracket . . . you'll just make margaritas. Follow?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-21-2015, 10:07 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigshrimpin View Post
You can with some brackets . . . but it depends on the dimensions. For example if the depth of the bracket is 25" (designed for 30" motors) and you mount a single 20" shaft outboard on the bracket . . . you'll just make margaritas. Follow?
Where oh where is my Spidercrab, where Oh where can he be.?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2015, 07:02 AM
flyingfrizzle flyingfrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadeco View Post
That's another question: Why it happens?

I guess that installing a bracket is something like " Do whatever you want!" and latter find out how to deal w/ it.

Yes as i said before i have seen a couple of posts from guys saying that they had to raise the motor a lot and in some of those posts even going to the last bolt, they feel that it should go up even more. That's why i asked the question: 20" shafts are ( in comparison) cheaper then 25" and so, why not?
On a 20' hull you can get by with a 20" motor but it will make the power head closer to the water than most people like. THe 25" motor will almost have the tilt/trim motor out of the water at rest where the 20" motor at rest will be down fairly far. The biggest problem I have seen is when you back the boat down. With the heavy rear weighted bracket the water swamps the outboard more with a bracket and the higher you can keep it the less issues of water intrusion. I wouldn't even try it on a 23' hull but you may get by with a 20' hull if you keep the boat calm water with a super light outboard. The taller leg just makes more since...
__________________
Current SeaCraft projects:
68 27' SeaCraft Race boat
71 20' SeaCraft CC sf
73 23' SeaCraft CC sf
74 20' SeaCraft Sceptre
74 20' SeaCraft CC sf
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2015, 06:04 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadeco View Post
I have read many posts from people tha had brackets installed on the Seacrafts, many times they say that they had to raise the motors (they were using 25" motors) in order to run perfect. Why can't a 20" motor be used instead of the 25" to solve this issue, one aspect of it would be cost since looks to me that 20" are cheaper then their 25" counterparts. Can someone clarify it to mew? Thanks
I understand where you're coming from, but I've put some numbers together based on my own rig, and I can't say for sure that a 20" motor would work. Depends on the specific bracket design, how low it's mounted on the boat, and what sort of prop you run. All I know for sure is that mine works fine with AV plate 3.5" above keel. How well it would work at 5 or 5.5 inches, I frankly don't know, although I intend to eventually try mine at 4.5-5". Frizz, how high did you end up mounting the motor on your 20' Sceptre and what is setback on that bracket? Besides the powerhead-close-to-water issue, Frizz also made a good point about how close the Trim & Tilt system will be to the waterline. If you left the boat in saltwater all the time, I think you could expect potential corrosion issues on those parts. When comparing motors I'd recommend adding the cost of a Bay Mfg. motor extension to the price of any 20" motor, just it case it didn't work!

Here's a summary of the measurements I made using the setup pictured below, where I carefully trimmed motor to make sure AV plate was parallel to keel. Last set of numbers in each row is what height would be on a 20" motor:

Bolt location / Mounting hole / 25" Av Plt Ht / 20"Av Plt Ht
OEM + 1" / # 4 / 3.5" / 8.5"
OEM / # 4 / 2.5" / 7.5"
OEM / # 1 / 0.5" / 5.5"

OK, here's the code to interpret cryptic table above. (Sorry the "columns" don't line up but didn't have time to make separate table!):
OEM = motor mounting bolt holes located where Don Herman originally drilled them. He later redrilled the holes at a 1" higher location, which is indicated by OEM + 1".
Mounting Hole #: Top hole in motor bracket is #1, bottom hole is #4. Distance between holes is ~11/16"; total distance from top to bottom hole is 2".

I don't have any good photos of my AV plate at cruise . . . need to put some black tape on it because it's hard to distinguish the white motor from white water, but it looks like AV plate still needs to come up another 1-1.5" so that would put it at 4.5-5". Don and I have discussed bracket mods required to do that but it won't happen for at least another couple months.

With regard to a 20" motor . . . my measurements indicate that if it was mounted as low as possible on my boat, the AV plate would be 5.5" above keel and I think that MIGHT be 0.5 -1.0" too high, depending on what prop you run. Will know better after I raise mine and test it. I need a stern lifting 4B prop; the PowerTech ELE4, the BRP Cyclone and Michigan Apollo 4B props all seem to grip pretty well and may be able to run higher. Dixon said he could run a 3B Stilletto prop very high on his transom mounted motor, but it might not generate the stern lift you'll generally need to counteract the CG shift created by a bracket on a 20.

All of the above numbers are for a 25" E-TEC on a Hermco bracket with a 30" setback. I don't know if all brands of motors use common standard dimensions but it would be worth measuring hole spacing to be sure. Don mounted the bracket per his recommendations; swim platform height is about 2" above water at rest and just touches the water when a couple of big guys standing on it, so bracket height is perfect and I wouldn't want to change it.

Now I have to admit that I didn't see much of a performance increase with the last 1" raise of the motor . . . maybe 50 rpm and 1 mph . . . so maybe it's not all that critical at the 20-25 kts I typically cruise at, but all the experts on both the E-TEC and Verado forums say that the AV plate is designed to run on top of solid water, so you've got extra drag if it's deeper than that. Plus all the years I spent trying to tweak jet engines to get the last 0.1% improvement in thrust and/or fuel consumption has made me a fanatic at trying to get the most out of an engine, so it kinda bugs me to know there is a potential improvement I'm missing!
Attached Images
  
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2015, 07:36 PM
Terry England Terry England is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida
Posts: 895
Default Bushwacker Analysis !

- And that is why Denny is the "Leader of the (Preformance) Pack"
(He's got so much inside his head it pushed all his hair follicles out just to make room!)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2015, 08:06 PM
hermco hermco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Jensen Beach, FL
Posts: 827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry England View Post
- And that is why Denny is the "Leader of the (Preformance) Pack"
(He's got so much inside his head it pushed all his hair follicles out just to make room!)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-23-2015, 08:20 PM
hermco hermco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Jensen Beach, FL
Posts: 827
Default

Do not fear Mr. Denny. We will soon see if we can get you the extra .01%. You are on my list. Beware! I will be cutting and grinding! One of the best attributes of a fiberglass bracket. Easy mods.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft